• 2013 Watcher

    Thank you for clarifying that point. I’m sure many gun-supporting citizens felt their weapon was the only solution.

    • HappyClinger

      It is. That is why you libs are attacking us “gun-supporting citizens” so vehemently and with so many ridiculous claims it’s pointless to argue with you.

  • David F. Podesta

    As a constitutional lawyer, Obama (should) know that the only way to alter a constitutional amendment is with another amendment; NOT an executive order. THEREFORE since the president knows this he knowingly and unlawfully usurped congress’s duties under the separation of powers section of the Constitution. He also violated his oath of Office to preserve, protect and defend the constitution…Congress should draft articles of impeachment against Obama even before the ink is dry on his executive ordeer

    • redwolf6911

      Obama and his wife were ordered by a Judge to give up their law licenses. Apparently for lying about something. Hummmm wonder what, there is so many lies.

    • David F. Podesta

      Not true. They voluntarily surrendered their law licenses. My guess is to avoid being disbarred.

    • beebee

      They only “voluntarily” surrendered their licenses after being threatened with disbarrment,,,,,,,,,,,,

    • NHConstitutionalist

      Obama lied on his bar exam. He stated he never used another name, which was a lie.
      Michelle for fraud and embezzlement in the firm she worked for.

      You can Google it. It’s all there.
      We have two scum bags living in our white house and drawing a salary for that privilege +$+$+$.

    • RubyBlu

      …same result.

    • David F. Podesta

      Isn’t that what I said?

    • Don Merriam

      That’s usually the only reason any attorney surrenders his or her license, to avoid prosecution.

    • KJ

      They each voluntarily surrendered their law licenses rather than suffering the embarrassment of being disbarred. It seems that there’s an ethical problem in their house–SURPRISE!

    • redwolf6911

      Harry Reid will block everything in the Senate.

    • David F. Podesta

      sad but true. HarReid is a huge POS.

    • beebee

      Is there any way to “block” reid and pelosi, along with a few others (valerie jarrett for starters)? As long as there is voter fraud happening in their states, it won’t happen. Any other suggestions?

    • LeSellers

      Jarrett is not an elected official. She’s not in the cabinet. She may be the de facto president, but there is nothing anyone can do about her.

      Mr. O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

    • http://www.facebook.com/charlesbigtruck Charles Durham

      Make sure they are not at the hearings.

    • LeSellers

      He cannot block a trial of the president. The House (assuming it would do it) has the power to impeach the president, the Senate must try the case.

      Now, since the Democrats have a majority, it would result in an acquittal, we all know that. But like it or not, C-SPAN would have to carry the trial, and the facts will come out, finally. (Again, assuming the House can put together a real team of “prosecutors”.)

      Mr. O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/W2N7SRNAULYNIXEECQXNTXTTLM Rick

      They need help at gun stores :)

    • LeSellers

      I’m sure that’s true. I’ve been looking at a couple of new handguns, and the demand is so overwhelming that they won’t be able to fill my order for three weeks.

      However, we see, once again, that O’bama does not want USmericans to have Jobs, He is going to make gun stores illegal, so no Jobs there.

      Mr. O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

    • JimRed

      “Mr. O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?”
      A large percentage will be perfecly happy to go jobless. as long as the checks come in and the EBT cards still work.

    • David F. Podesta

      Not while he’s the president. Food stamps, sure! but no jobs in fact jobs will be lost due to Obamacare.

    • KJ

      Not just jobs–Hey, Obama: ever plan on telling the truth about Benghazi and why you left our citizens to die without sending any aid? What about your hollow promise to apprehend those responsible? What do you know, when did you know it, and what did you authorize with Fast and Furious? And how about unsealing all of your college records and passport documents? What other objectionable or illegal facts are you hiding?

    • LeSellers

      Your points are important and well made.

      Alas! that too few USmericans care about any of them. “Jobs” is something they can understand (although too many of our countrymen don’t want a Job: they prefer a welfare check).

      Mr. O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

    • Ret. Marine

      He is never going to allow the true intentions of the bengahzi incident to the light of truth, why, gun running operation+they had individuals who planned and executed the removal of 20,000 MANPADS from tha late Lybian leaders arsenal, you know the ones that shoot down airliners and combat vehicles on the ground. It’s called treason, and an EO will/does not cover this crime. Why do you think all propaganda goes through the black-house for approval?, thats a no-brainer, if the American public got wind of this unLawfull Act of TREASON carried out by a siting President, why heads would be demanded of them, to be taken off at the neck. The so-called media is covering for an act of TREASON, an impeachable crime by this regime. .

    • Don Merriam

      The Senate would have to try the case, but they don’t have to find him guilty and with a Democratic majority, they won’t. Reid, Feinstein, and Schumer will all see to that.

    • LeSellers

      I believe I said that in the second ‘graf:
      “Now, since the Democrats have a majority, it would result in an acquittal, we all know that. …”

      My point, lest anyone missed it, was that the information would get out, irrespective of the legal (or political) outcome. That can only help the cause of freedom.

      Mr. O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

    • David F. Podesta

      Maybe there MUST BE a trial, but in a democrat controlled senate he’ll never be convicted.

    • LeSellers

      Yes, just as at least two of us have said in this topic.

      My point was that the case, first, would have to take place, second, it would have to be televised, and third, that this would put the information about the current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in front of a public who has not seen it, and who have been told it doesn’t exist anyway.

      Mr. O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Young/100001630951601 Mike Young

      It is just too bad that Dirty Harry Reid can’t be Recalled or Impeached, as he is the main player in Washington D.C.who is blocking Obama from being Impeached.

    • RubyBlu

      add him to the ‘complaint’.

    • LeSellers

      He can be impeached. It’s unlikely, and I’m unsure of the process, but impeachment is an open path according to Article 2, Section 4 of the Constitution.

      Recall, however, that impeachment is not a “legal” proceeding, it’s a political process. The Democrats are in power, so nothing will happen.

      It’s up to Nevada, in four years, to remove him from office. By then the damage will be irreversible.

      Mr. O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

    • Don Merriam

      We tried. They don’t call him “Dirty Harry” for nothing. Reid got re-elected because he carried the urban areas, just like Feinstein and Boxer do in California. Only one rural county, Mineral County, voted for Reid because he used his pull to keep the Army Ammunition Plant open in Hawthorne. Aside from that, we never see his sneaky ass outside of Vegas and Reno without a Highway Patrol escort to protect him from the people.

    • David F. Podesta

      If it was proven that he did, in fact,take a bribe, and there ARE rumors to that effect, he could be ousted also and that might unclog the senate like a big dose of Ex-Lax.

    • Dave

      The 2nd amendment cannot be amended

    • buzz131950

      What makes you believe that?

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Young/100001630951601 Mike Young

      It is called the Dick Act of 1910 read it and enjoy.

    • buzz131950

      I see nothing in the Militia Act of 1903 which prevents the 2nd Ammendment from being ammended or even repealed.

    • Don Merriam

      That’s a good point, Buzz. The same can be said for all of your other rights as well. Only the Second Amendment actually places the tools in your hands to defend the others as a last resort. It’s the final check in a long system of checks and balances when all else fails. You might want to read up on the uprising in the Warsaw Ghetto if you don’t understand that concept. Guns were the only thing that allowed the Jews to slow down the Nazis. By the time they had to use them, German judges had all been corrupted and coerced into wearing swastikas on their robes and being members of the Nazi party if they wanted to keep their jobs. Where does a person find real justice or protection in a system like that?

      There’s nothing in the Fourth Amendment that says it can’t be repealed either and the government through their actions over time have essentially done just that. If you can be searched at will, detained at will under the guise of “national security” and incarcerated without trial or benefit of an attorney, do you really think you’ll be allowed to exercise your First Amendment rights much longer? What about your Fifth Amendment rights to due process before your property can be seized or your right not to be coerced into providing evidence against yourself? If they decide to make possession of high capacity magazines and certain guns that you may own and bought with your own money, and they decide confiscation is the only answer, where is the due process? When that day comes, don’t expect yourself to also be protected under the Eight Amendment from cruel and unusual punishment either.

      The Bill of Rights is a package deal. We either respect it in its entirety or we essentially reject it in its entirety. They’re all equally important and they’re all inextricably linked together.

    • boone1

      The Constitution it self cannot be amended onless there is a con con and that will take 35 states to do and i don’t think it will happen with obama the communist.

    • NHConstitutionalist

      It’s 38 states in approval of an amendment that are needed to amend the Constitution. 3/4 of 50.

    • David F. Podesta

      The 2nd half of this post was lost somewhere. It can’t be amended but it CAN be repealed and replaced (or not) by another amendment.

    • Frank Zappa

      THANK YOU: I just stated this yesterday on another blog but used the word Treason along with Impeachment attached to Obama and his dictatorship and overreach of his office.

    • crosshairs

      Its impeachment time and the time is now.

    • KJ

      Overdue

    • FLBuck

      Wayyyyy Overdue !!!!!

    • Tim Newton

      NO GOING TO HAPPEN!

    • Doug

      unfortunately you are right. since there is a dem controlled congress they will never allow impeachment proceedings.

    • Rattlerjake

      A friend sent me this video showing the relationship between socialism, marxism, and communism and how democrats and Obama all relate. Sorry for length of this video. It speaks a serious message!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is an absolutely a must see video. Take the time to watch this. It is truly unbelievable. Don’t let your ideology get in the way. Keep an open mind. http: //vimeo . com/52009124

    • wtram46

      All well and good David–but, our Congress is a do-nothing bunch of misfits and your words ring hollow on this thing that they will not do!! It will be to us as individuals to defy these orders–we can expect no help from our Congress!!

    • SIR JAMES

      I don’t think a flop eared jack ass can be a Constitutional lawyer. They can’t read .

      OH and Zero had his law license jerked from him as did his big butt old lady that should render both as NON-LAWYERS!

    • Joe

      Amen! And don’t forget how Obama issued an executive order that tax dollars wouldn’t be used for abortions (only to appease certain democrat hold outs so they would vote for Obama-Care) and we know how valid that executive order was.

  • GDC

    Obama, Biden and Holder MUST be Impeached, prosecuted and EXECUTED for MURDER, TREASON, SEDITION and ALL the other CRIMES they have committed including FRAUD and FORGERY.

    • gary

      We can’t depend on the senate to impeach no one. and is it true that we can’t impeach him if we are saying he holds this office by fraud. If we convict him as a fraud we can undo everything he has done. If we impeach him we are admitting him to be eligible to hold office and can’t undo anything he has done .To me that is stupid why can’t we the people can vote and do what we see fit. I don’t know why we can’t undo what he has done it is against the constitution anyway

    • 2duane

      Remember the “We” you are talking about were not enough in numbers to elect someone else over the past two elections. So why would you think “WE” would be able to have him tossed out of office. It would take 75% of both houses for that to happen. And ‘We’ know that will never happen.

    • HappyClinger

      The House of Representatives does the impeaching, not the Senate.

    • jack

      They only bring the charges up the senate does the trialo

    • LeSellers

      Impeachment is not the trial. Impeachment is the formal bringing of charges. It’s like an Article 32 investigation in the military or a “true bill” from a Grand Jury.

      The Senate tries the case as defined by the article(s) of impeachment.

      While this has little value except as a bet, the fact is that two presidents have been impeached (Johnson and Clinton), but none has been convicted.

      Mr. O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

    • beebee

      Impeachment won’t work as you stated, how about charges of treason? There certainly is more than enough evidence (“fast and furious”, and Benghazi) and there is probably way more that we don’t know about.

    • donfrazier

      Where are the survivors of Genghazi????

    • LeSellers

      Tunisia just released one for “lack of evidence”.

      Oh, you meant USmerican survivors! Never mind, then.

      Mr. O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

    • jack

      Go back & read his comment he asked about survivors not suspects

    • LeSellers

      While this one obviously did, not all suspects survive.

      I hope no one else missed the irony I intended.

      Mr. O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

  • Max

    I will not obay any of Ovmit execative orders no way

    • jerryhulick

      Write all the excutive orders you want, now try to enforce them you burr head jerk

    • http://www.facebook.com/buster.atkins Buster Atkins

      This is definatly is not Huffpost. They won’t print any of my stuff

    • http://www.facebook.com/buster.atkins Buster Atkins

      I hope you don’t feel like you are the only one

  • shark60

    An executive order is in fact a fiat. A fiat is issued by a supreme ruler. We are a Constitutional Republic and as such there is no place for a fiat, Therefore an executive order is unconstitutional and the people are bound to defy said fiat. The first ten Amendments exist to curb government over reach that intrude on my rights. Peaceful disobedience and if that does not work rebellion is the only viable action!

    • buzz131950

      The first executive order was issued by GEORGE WASHINGTON. If it was unconstitutional you would think that the framers of the Constitution would have made that known at the time.

    • KJ

      Plain and simple: an executive order is intended to clarify the execution of an existing law which has been created by the legislature.

    • LeSellers

      It may be intended to clarify when the president is an honest man. In O’bama’s case, however, we can rule that out.

      Mr. O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/YZILT7FI37IEGIGZ47H34VLVAY skyhawk

    Absolutely not.It is as illegal as the Islamic/Communist bastard that initiates it.

  • Oldtymepatriot

    Our national government is in a sorry state today. More actual “governing” is being done by people who have no authority to issue orders, mandates, restrictions, rules, or regulations than by the one branch that is Constitutionally delegated that task. Appointees, bureaucrats, hirelings, and especially the POTUS and courts cannot legislate, but since we allow ourselves (even our state and local governments) to be cowed, by threats of penalties, those at the national level get away with it.

  • redwolf6911

    If an EO breaks the Constitution, then it is illegal and requires action of a full Congress.

  • Dave

    “A government that does not trust its law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms is itself unworthy of trust.” — James Madison.

    • http://www.facebook.com/buster.atkins Buster Atkins

      Thats for sure! Jim sure knew what he was talking about.

    • JimRed

      An individual who can’t be trusted to bear arms should not be running around loose – JimRed

  • Burke02

    The president can’t make laws. Laws are made by congress. If Obama intends to ban guns by executive order, it’s unconstitutional. Not one of us has to obey an unconstitutional edict…which is all it is. I believe that each of us should respond to the President and tell him we aren’t going to submit to his will. He isn’t a king, he isn’t a dictator, he’s the president and as such answers to we the people.

    • crosshairs

      A President is nothing more then a figure head.he needs to be impeached.Only if Boehner had the ba— to do it.

  • Dave

    It is an ancient Principle of Law that a “law” which is contrary to the Constitution is “no law at all” – it is void ab initio (void from the beginning) and binds no one.

  • junkmailbin

    only if within Constitutional powers and by a president who is a natural born citizen, not a subject of the English crown

    • HappyClinger

      I wish I could click the ^ button more than once!

    • Don Merriam

      Not even then! Congress makes the laws. All the president has legal authority to do is veto or sign the bills into law and see that the laws of the land are enforced. He has absolutely no authority whatsoever under the Constitution to legislate by fiat or decree. Executive Orders are supposed to be limited to WITHIN the executive branch in order for that branch to run effectively. The reason FDR could get away with interning Japanese-Americans during WWII was because he was acting as Commander-in-Chief of the armed services in time of a declared war by Congress.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001005047076 Donna Blickenstaff

    What I really like is how everyone screams Executive Orders but No One will tell us exactly what the Executive order is, From What I have read and understand the ONLY thing he can do with his Executive Order is enforce stricter laws such as enhance the enforcement of laws already in the books, such as in the areas of mental Illness screenings, background checks, and they are not banning the certain sales of ammo/guns or close gun show loopholes. The will override for the sole purpose of Mental Illness checks and Universal background checks for gun buyers and a National Database to track weapons sales/movements, stricter penalties for guns in a school zones, and giving guns to minors. They will not make a lot of progress without Congress, that’s a legislative action that has to be done with the consent of both parties and that’s where the challenge is. From what I understand Congress is not on board with this which is why he is wanting to override them but even so, he can ONLY do what I mentioned above, without Congress he can do no more. I ‘ve been so upset here lately listening to everyone talking about Revolutions and they are coming for our guns, Well they might later but not for now. I am not listening to everyone jumping up and down screaming ” The British are coming the British are coming” They very well might but not for now. We call the Democrats dumb and stupid and have their heads in the sand and how they drink the kool-aid, but really we are not better than them when we take these things and run with them and get all wigged out and scream REVOLUTION, instead of learning Exactly what Obama can and cant do. I honestly believe if he tries a take over even the Democrats will be against that and up rise with us and I think Govt know this too well. I do believe something is up but just not to sure what it is, that’s why I listen and watch and so far, I really don’t see nothing coming soon. So Relax……..

    • Bob

      Relax? I think NOT. We all must be on our guard with this dictator.

    • beebee

      Absolutely. Otherwise why is he buying up so much ammunition and guns, and training his “brown shirts” to be his personal civilian army??? And what about the FEMA “camps” we hear so much about? He’s grooming himself to become our dictator for life………

    • Don Merriam

      I agree. That’s what Caesar did, cater to the poor, promise them help and hope, then use national crisis the to extend the Roman limit on dictatorial power from six months to the end of thereafter short life. At least the Romans had senators that would take action to remove the threat and restore theri usurped power.

    • Don Merriam

      his*

    • Guest

      their*

    • HappyClinger

      Yeah, like anyone’s been so effective at stopping him so far. You relax. I’ll stand vigil. But don’t come crying to me when TSHTF because I’ll be busy protecting myself.

    • Don Merriam

      That’s what they’re hoping we do, relax. As Ben Franklin once advised us, “The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.”

  • floridarooster

    Wake up people! Obama is becoming the biggest threat to our country since WWII. He is a fraud and a liar, and he is getting away with it and slowly appointing himself dictator. Now gun control? The similarities between Obama and Hitler’s background and rise to power is scary.

    • crosshairs

      It is said, when you start backing the patriots into a corner,all hell is going to break loose.

  • GPM

    EOs were originally used to allow the president to order his own house and to control those who worked directly for his office. Now, with so much “mission drift” an EO can cover anything and is enforceable by all of those very dangerous armed people who answer to the pres. and not to congress or (heaven forbid) the people!

    In the beginning, Geo. Washington was offered the crown and office of King. He wisely turned it down as we had just fought a long and bloody war to free ourselves of one king. I truly believe that Barry Soetoro, the Kenyan born Indonesian, feels that he should have that crown that Washington turned down. After all, he actually believes that he is the smartest man in the world and knows what is best for everyone. He already has a court jester with Joking Joe, the mentally challenged, insanely laughing VP.

    • Libertylady

      My understanding of the EO is that is only applies to those departments in the executive Branch of government, not legislative, not judicial. Not that it would stop our Joe Stalin, Jr. in the WH. This is why the Founders kept the executive branch lean and with clearly -defined powers… They were deathly afraid of another “king”.

    • HappyClinger

      There is no provision in the Constitution for EO’s of any nature.

  • 63Marine

    Impeachment? It will not happen. Our government is so “Lilly Livered” they are afraid of their own shadows. The only way to correct what the American idiots have done by re-electing the usurper is to storm the White House and physically remove the muslim communist from office. If he continues on his present path, it may happen sooner than later.

  • ER12696490

    I would never obey a exective order. The only thing I may obey if it is passed by congress or the senate and maybe I may comply. This illegal,Muslim,liar I would never comply with or his joke side kick.

  • PassTheWord

    This is a ploy to cause a knee jerk reaction. He knows that any executive order violating the 2nd Amendment will be met with a judicial challenge. He will then simply say I tried and those evil gun owners stopped me. He will again have hidden his stink with the perfume of the being the liberal champion for the cause.

  • Bill

    The King should know, but probably doesn’t, an Executive Order is similar to a memo. If he were to try to amend the Constitution with an Executive Order it would be struck down by any court that isn’t bought and paid for by the libs. In today’s environment it would be less than 50/50. After all, a movie hasn’t set case law.

  • Don Merriam

    Face it people, the Constitution is nothing more than a cleaning rag if it doesn’t live and thrive in people’s hearts. Obama can do ANYTHING he wants, constitutional or unconstitutional, if the people don’t collectively oppose him. All he needs is the army and the police to follow orders. At least half of the army will not think twice about carrying out the orders they’re given. Most police will do as they’re ordered.

    Facts from history: 1. Good or bad, the people with the weapons make the rules. 2. People with weapons are free, people without weapons are slaves. If you doubt that last statement, look at the way gangs in our inner cities and Mexico do whatever they want whenever they feel like it. Why does it go on? Because they have more numbers and weapons to draw upon than the local citizenry. Look at the mafia in NYC. What do the police really do about them? 3. Democracy is chaos that can only work successfully in small city-states such as Athens. They can’t work on a large scale country such as ours, which is why we have a republic. 4. The average lifespan of a republic throughout history has always been 200-300 years before political apathy and fiscal irresponsibility on the part of the people drains the treasury dry. We’ve just celebrated our 224th birthday as a constitutional republic.

    To those who believe the Constitution is an antiquated document relative only to a bygone era, I say times may change, but human nature does not. Our plan of government was put in place to control politically ambition people who believe the end justifies the means. Obama and his followers are just such a set of people. Most of them were never taught the meaning of the word “No!” at an early age (What sort of mother do you think BHO really had as a child?) and don’t see themselves bound by the same conventions and restrictions as the rest of us. They’re “special” and know best what we’re all too stupid to understand. For them, the Constitution really is nothing more than a cleaning rag and they intend to throw it right in our faces when they tell us to clean up for them and do the dirty jobs that are beneath their station in life.

    To Donna Blickenstaff, no disrespect intended, but few people ever see a dictatorship coming before it arrives. The Cubans didn’t see it coming. They thought Castro had their best interests at heart. The Chinese didn’t see it. They thought Mao was a man of the people out to make life better for them. The Austrians didn’t see it when 98 percent of them voted for annexation with Germany. Six months later, they knew Hitler was a dictator. Obama can’t share what’s really on his mind with the people yet because total power is still outside his grasp. Once he has that, he’ll freely tell us what his plans are. First they disarm the people. Later, you won’t even be able to watch “The Patriot” because it will be deemed a subversive film that’s bad for public safety and national security, nor will you be able to read these blogs. It always happens because people become so used to the status quo and long established institutions that they think “it can’t happen here”. All of the examples I mentioned above had people thinking that way. The purpose of revolutions and coups is to destroy long established institutions and create a new system in their destruction. Some are even bloodless in nature when they occur, like subsidizing three generations of welfare bums who can all be controlled by the threat of cutting off their food stamps and rent subsidies. If over the course of several decades you reward people for being unproductive, you create learned helplessness and dependency. Throw in unchecked reproduction where you give them a pay raise in welfare benefits for each additional dependent on top of it all and you achieve a voting majority of a dependent class, our current Democratic Party and their constituents. Once the numbers go over 50 percent, you’ve pulled off a bloodless coup. Now is not the time to relax.

    • JimRed

      “Throw in unchecked reproduction where you give them a pay raise in welfare benefits for each additional dependent on top of it all and you achieve a voting majority of a dependent class, our current Democratic Party and their constituents.”
      Don, well said; one small edit suggested. Democrat Party, please, because there’s nothing democratic about it!

  • VirgoVince

    WHO cares about what ovomit wants, EVERYONE just tell him, GFY!!!!

  • the bee guy

    An executiveorder which voilates the oath of office to uphold the Constitution, is a treasonous act, and clearly impeachable. If the Senate chooses to ignore the fact of the violation and fails to uphold the the oath of office, they took, thay also should have suits, and or charges brought against them. same with Congress. Also note: when a Supreme Court Justice takes a poaition clearly in opposition to the intent and meaning of the constitution, they to MUST be impeached! If we fail to demand it, the problem iswith we the people, not with the government.

  • Buck

    He never obeys the laws. He need to go to jail

  • Mys77

    Just wondering if Obama studied constitutional…did he do it to uphold and undestand it… or as we are seeing, to abolish it and shred it? What do you think? I would like to know… is this really how we want to live? If this was a Republican president doing this…. would all you stupid dems be on board??? Just remember, you dems set this up, come next presidential election and a republican takes over… you will see some conservatve pounding your lying liberals agenda into the ground. And we fight with God on our side and the Constitutional right to do so.

  • dad666

    This will go to court so fast it will spin his ears and cause flight.

  • http://www.facebook.com/roy.butler2 Roy Butler

    I agree, but what we’re missing here is that by mobilizing the Department of Homeland Security and by leveraging a brief delay in due process, Obama can effectively ban the importation, manufacture, sale, and ownership of guns and ammo, thereby disarm the vast majority of Americans by a single stroke of his pen.

    How? By requiring Congress to take the matter before the Supreme Court for a Judicial Decision. All Obama would need is the ability to enforce his Order before such a decision could be reached. Tragically for us, G.W. Bush empowered Obama to carry out this plan by mobilizing the Department of Homeland Security.

  • wtram46

    Obama–the world’s next dictator!!! Take him down now–put him in jail!!!

  • gypsy314

    Impeach this negro

  • brabbie2002

    I refuse to do anything this muslim praising twit puts out as law. It will be merely a ploy for his “royal nibs” to take over as dictator-in-chief!

citizens-against-obamacare

Become An Insider!

Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Back to top
mobile desktop